View all glossary terms

Technology and architecture

What Is Agentic AI: AI That Takes a Goal, Plans Its Own Steps and Carries Them Out

KDLPublished

Agentic AI refers to AI that, when given a goal, plans the steps it needs on its own, chooses and runs the tools it needs, and adjusts its next action after checking the intermediate results.

Why Agentic AI Became Necessary

Even when AI gave an answer, people still had to carry the work forward.

As generative AI entered business work, summarizing documents and drafting text became faster. But after receiving a summary, people still had to look up the materials they needed, query systems and register the results, one step at a time. AI had stayed in a mode of asking once and answering once.

Real work consists of many steps. You decide what to check first, use the tools you need, and change the next action based on intermediate results. Agentic AI points to a direction in which AI carries this process forward itself.

When applying it to work, what matters more than how autonomous it is is how far it can be trusted. As autonomy grows, goals, permissions, records and approvals must be designed together.

A Precise Definition of Agentic AI: How It Differs from Generative AI

Three Axes That Separate Generative AI and Agentic AI

First, the unit of processing differs. Generative AI is often used to produce one output from one input. Agentic AI splits a single goal into a series of actions and processes them.

Second, the way it connects to the outside differs. Generative AI creates answers within the context it is given. Agentic AI calls tools such as search, databases and business systems to obtain information and write results.

Third, the way results are handled differs. People read and judge the results of generative AI. Agentic AI checks its own intermediate results, corrects its next action, and asks a person to confirm only under set conditions.

Agentic AI and AI Agent are often used together. Agentic AI refers to the quality or direction, while AI Agent often refers to the system that has that quality and actually performs the work. In business contexts, what matters is which system handles which work rather than the quality itself, so it is less confusing to keep the two terms apart.

The Four Abilities That Make Up Agentic AI

Four Abilities That Let AI Carry Work Forward

First, planning. The goal is divided into items to check and actions to take, and their order is set. The plan is not made once and then fixed. It is redrawn as intermediate results come in.

Second, tool use. It chooses and calls the tools needed, such as document recognition, lookup, calculation and registration, and receives the results. The tools it can use are limited to a predefined list.

Third, context retention. It remembers the facts confirmed in earlier steps and intermediate results, and reflects them in later judgments. It prevents the same document from being checked repeatedly and stops actions that contradict earlier conclusions.

Fourth, checking and correction. It verifies whether the results meet the conditions, and if not, tries another method or passes the case to a person. The clearer the checking criteria, the fewer cases are handed to a person, and the reasons for handing them over become clearer.

Even when all four abilities are in place, the system cannot simply be used for work. The organization must decide which tools may be used and which actions require approval before the abilities can be used safely.

How to Apply Agentic AI in Practice

Set the Level of Autonomy for Each Action

Not every action needs the same level of autonomy. Lookup and confirmation can be left to the AI on its own, while system registration and customer notification run only after approval. The level is set for each type of action.

The level is determined by how easily the result can be reversed and by the impact if it is wrong. The list of actions that need approval is agreed on by the business department and the internal control department.

Start with Actions That Are Easy to Reverse

At first, hand over actions whose results are easy to undo, such as checking documents or finding missing items, and widen the scope as the decision records show good results. Giving write permissions too early can put errors straight into the system.

When widening the scope, first check the earlier records for the points where the AI often stopped and the points where people corrected its results. It is safer to hand over the next action after those points have decreased.

Keep a Record of Each Action Step by Step

Because agentic AI goes through several steps, looking only at the final result makes it hard to tell where a problem began. Record step by step which tool was called with which input, what result came back, and what was decided based on it.

These records are used to find the cause of errors and become the basis for revising judgment rules and tool settings. They must be kept in a form that the person in charge can read. Records that people cannot understand are hard to use as explanatory material when something goes wrong.

Agentic AI in the Domestic Environment

In domestic finance and the public sector, calls to external APIs are often restricted by network separation rules, so the models and tools used by the agent must run internally.

The Framework Act on Artificial Intelligence took effect on January 22, 2026, together with its enforcement decree. It requires users to be told in advance when a service is based on generative AI or high-impact AI, and it asks operators in the ten areas it defines to carry out duties such as risk management and human oversight. When agentic AI is used for work such as screening, these requirements must be reflected in the flow.

Frequently asked questions

Are agentic AI and AI Agent the same thing?

They are close but used a little differently. Agentic AI often refers to the ability to plan and act on its own, while AI Agent often refers to the system that has that ability.

If we use agentic AI, do we no longer need people?

No. People keep the role of setting goals, permissions and judgment criteria, and approving actions that are hard to reverse. A role for sample review of a set percentage of AI-processed results is also needed.

Is there a risk of hallucination?

Yes. Across several steps, a wrong intermediate result can carry into the next action, so a structure is needed that checks and records the evidence at each step.

Which work should we start with?

Start with checking work where results are easy to reverse and the judgment criteria are written down as documents. For the first few weeks, record every action and have people check the results while refining the criteria.

Can it be used alongside existing automation tools?

Yes. The common arrangement is for existing automation to handle the sections with clear rules, and agentic AI to handle the sections that require judgment.

What about cost and processing time?

Models and tools are called at every step, so cost and processing time grow with the number of calls. It is better to set the number of steps and a call limit for each type of work.

How is performance measured?

By the share of work completed to the end, the share of cases where a person intervened, and the number of wrong actions, rather than by the quality of the answers.

Tell us the steps of the work you want to hand to AI, and we will split it into the parts it can handle itself and the parts that need approval.

Contact us